search

ooawagaeri / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

DG: Manual Testing #11

Open ooawagaeri opened 2 years ago

ooawagaeri commented 2 years ago

Missing testing documentation for edit, find, fav, unfav

nus-pe-bot commented 2 years ago

Team's Response

Kindly refer to this screenshot (requirements for DG):

image.png

We have clear information and example inputs/outputs about edit, find, fav and unfav in the UG.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: I do partially agree that they may be overlapping information that the UG may contain but how about negative test cases and how these examples are expected to react? There are not repeating and do complement the UG in allowing readers to know what specific reaction they are suppose to receive if an invalid command was given. The requirements merely states "minimise repeating information", but have at least 2 manual test case examples per command wont be a long list of all possible variations and wont be repeating a lot as they can be different examples from the UG, and will also "cover all user-testable features". This last point is the crucial requirement for Manual Testing which was not met.