Should we require "browser/http.rb" into "browser/setup/traditional.rb" ?

opal / opal-browser

Browser support for Opal.

MIT License

115 stars 36 forks source link

Should we require "browser/http.rb" into "browser/setup/traditional.rb" ? #94

Closed zw963 closed 2 years ago

zw963 commented 2 years ago

Just curious, why browser/http.rb not belongs to traditional.

Thank you.

hmdne commented 2 years ago

It's a traditional set of requires for those who require 'browser' and not adjust their dependencies, basically a legacy thing we may get rid of someday when we decide to break compatibility. See #60

zw963 commented 2 years ago

Thank you!