Open llemeurfr opened 3 years ago
Isn't this the same as the publication.metadata.description
key?
In the Swift OPDS 1 parser, we take content
then summary
as a fallback for description
:
description: tag("content") ?? tag("summary"),
No it is the "summary" of an OPDS 1 entry, which is mapped to an OPDS 2 Link object.
Example OPDS1 feed: http://gallica.bnf.fr/opds
"Formats accessibles"
"Livres téléchargeables dans un format accessible (EPUB 3, DAISY DTBook)"
The current TypeScript implementation (r2-opds-js
) converts OPDS1 title
to OPDS2 Title
property of the Link
object, and converts OPDS1 summary
to an untyped JSON "additional property" named title_summary
. See:
http://readium2.herokuapp.com/opds-v1-v2-convert/%20http%3A%2F%2Fgallica.bnf.fr%2Fopds%20
Thorium displays the OPDS1 summary
as a tooltip to the main Entry title
(I will post screenshots below shortly)
Thorium screenshot:
Following the work done for the additional EPUB metadata, we could store it as an extension by expanding the XML namespace of the <summary>
tag:
{
"properties": {
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom#summary": "Tout juste ajouté sur Gallica"
},
"type": "application/atom+xml;profile=opds-catalog;kind=navigation",
"title": "Dernières mises en ligne",
"rel": "http://opds-spec.org/sort/popular",
"href": "https://gallica.bnf.fr/services/engine/search/opds?operation=searchRetrieve&version=1.2&exactSearch=false&query=dc.format%20all%20%22epub%22%20sortby%20indexationdate%2Fsort.descending%20&filter=provenance%20all%20%22bnf.fr%22"
}
We've inherited summary
from Atom, but it's never something that was very useful IMO.
Various organizations have rolled out OPDS 2.0 support over the years but no one ever expressed their interest in such an extension. I'll tag this issue with the "OPDS 2.0" label, but I wouldn't consider adding this to our roadmap of topics to cover without broader interest.
In https://gallica.bnf.fr/opds we find entries like
There is currently no way to map the summary to an internal object modelled after OPDS 2. DO we live with the absence of this possibly useful information?