Closed mateoclarke closed 7 years ago
I think we should also consider short discussions followed by break-out groups.
I've done that previously within an organization(Feminists United) and it got a great response since everyone got presented to for a bit and then we went into smaller groups to further discuss the issues. In the end we came together and recapped a bit on what each group discussed in relation to the topic.
We did this for issues such as racism, classism, privlege, etc. It helped people stay engaged and made us a tighter community.
We did a few things in that group that I really liked and need to probably share.
I learned a lot with that group and in a semster we grew 3x our orignial size because of better marketing(new logos, social media curation/maintenance,etc ), meeting structure, and overall organization. Let me know what ya'll think about the above and if we can incoporate any of it moving forward.
Let me know if y'all have any questions too. I can maybe dig around and find some old stuff that we used. I think that group took a lot more work since we met weekly but there were 7 people on the team.
https://www.glasshousepolicy.org/ Francisco Enriquez, Co-Founder and Managing Director
In the 84th Legislative Session, Glasshouse Policy crowdsourced public opinion on Texas fire prevention policies. Working with advocates and stakeholders from across Texas, Glasshouse Policy produced a citizen-sourced, collaboratively produced set of policy recommendations informed directly by our crowdsourcing platform. In 2017, Glasshouse Policy will continue our Texas Capitol Project on a new set of state challenges.
Cool, Becca A signed up for a lightning talk June 20!
Yay, I'll add a list to the top.
Started a new todo for 2017, closing this one.
Ideas: