Open dlee138 opened 9 years ago
K Means deals with compactness of spatial data while spectral clustering deals with connectivity. Spectral Clustering is important when determining neural network connectivity. I would think K means is important when determining more of a geographical localization understanding. Does this make more sense?
Yes, so K-means focuses more on "closeness" while spectral deals with connectivity.
I think spectral clustering is also more useful when dealing with higher dimensions with the use of eigenvalues to cluster in fewer dimensions.
What was the strategic reason as to why spectral clustering was used in the Pavlovic paper? Can someone give me a brief overview of how spectral clustering works and how it differs from some of the other methods we discussed in class such as k-means?