Open indigorose1 opened 9 years ago
More commonly used in paper could be: ...... graph attributes (GA) ...... ......GA.......GA......GA.......GA......GA.......GA......GA.......GA......GA.......GA......
The problem is that's boring and uninformative. It's also reminiscent of a beautiful peachy state and not the equally beautiful dimensions by which a graph can be examined. Solution: graphtributes.
Either one of those is cool. Or we could get math-y and say AG to distinguish between overall graph attributes and, say, node attributes (AN) or edge attributes (AE).
Out of curiosity, are NA (node attributes) and EA (edge attributes) commonly used abbreviations in papers? Or is the more mathy thing mentioned above the norm?
It would also be one of the very few words in the English language that has 4 consonants in a row.
I think we should portmanteau "graph attributes" to graphtributes, because it sounds way cooler and it's otherwise awkward to say, especially when you have to say it often.