If I want to show that one model (i.e. SBM) does a better job than another in a clustering problem, would an adjusted rand index (ARI) be appropriate for this and how would I implement it? I've seen some cases where the ARI is bound by [0,1] and other cases its [-1,1] and I'm confused as to whether it is a standard to implement negative values where the model is even worse than chance. Also, any other tools I could use other than the ARI for comparing different SBMs?
If I want to show that one model (i.e. SBM) does a better job than another in a clustering problem, would an adjusted rand index (ARI) be appropriate for this and how would I implement it? I've seen some cases where the ARI is bound by [0,1] and other cases its [-1,1] and I'm confused as to whether it is a standard to implement negative values where the model is even worse than chance. Also, any other tools I could use other than the ARI for comparing different SBMs?