Add contract.hasBargainPurchase and contrat.bargainPurchase

[ColinMaudry]

Section V 2.6) of TED forms, visible in F06, looks like this:

V.2.6) Price paid for bargain purchases (if applicable): Value excluding VAT: ____ Currency: _

It could be implemented so that data could look like this:

"award": {
        "bargainPurchase": {
          "amount": 13500,
          "currency": "EUR"
        }
      }

[jpmckinney]

I think since there is no checkbox in TED forms, we can omit hasBargainPurchase.

I'm unclear on the difference between V.2.4 and V.2.6 in the case of bargain purchases. Is it possible for the award value of the contract/lot to be different from the price paid for bargain purchases? (Is it possible for only part of the award value to be related to bargain purchases?)

[ColinMaudry]

OK to remove hasBargainPurchase

Looking at the form, it's hard to tell whether the bargain purchase is included or not in V 2.4).

The last checkbox of annex D2 states:

Bargain purchase taking advantage of a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a price considerably lower than market prices

That looks like a definition of bargain purchases.

[ColinMaudry]

We could also follow the eForms model and have a code list for justifications for direct award. However, that would limit bargain purchases to direct awards.

Although, can a bargain purchase occur without a direct award? Even outside EU?

[jpmckinney]

Let's go with the eForms option, in which case the mapping is (based on https://github.com/eForms/eForms/issues/324#issuecomment-523599273):

Discard. If Bargain purchase taking advantage of a particularly advantageous opportunity available for a very short time at a price considerably lower than market prices is checked in Annex D2, then this is the same as Information on value of the contract/lot.

[jpmckinney]

Closed by 0ea9bb6319dc9b721c56269c5ebcafd0a345aa40 in european-union-support