Closed duncandewhurst closed 1 year ago
@jpmckinney are you happy with the proposal in this issue?
Yes. I think the description of budget.description
in the OCDS 1.2-dev branch has changed in a recent PR, so please refer to that in case any corresponding changes need to be made to the proposal.
Will do. Thanks!
The CoST IDS mapping includes the following mapping for funding sources:
However, CoST West Lombok's platform captures the funding sources for a project in a single free-text field, which may combine multiple sources. For example:
We can recommend that, going forward, CoST West Lombok should capture a list of funding sources for each project, which can be modelled using
budget.budgetBreakdown
and/or theparties
section. We can also recommend that CoST West Lombok manually cleanse historical data to split out the funding sources for each project. However, this issue is likely to occur with other CoST programmes, which typically implement many of the elements of the CoST IDS as free-text fields in their systems.OCDS's approach, at the contracting process level, is to have a
description
field on theBudget
object with the following description:Proposal
Add a
description
field tobudget
with the following description:Alternative
Another option is to add a single
BudgetBreakdown
object tobudget.budgetBreakdown
and set its.description
to the free-text description of the funding sources. However, semantically, this is not a breakdown of the budget.References: