open-contracting / ocds-extensions

Collects issues for published extensions in one place
1 stars 0 forks source link

Finance: Alternatives for use outside PPPs #79

Open jpmckinney opened 5 years ago

jpmckinney commented 5 years ago

The financeType.csv codelist should have options for public/government funding and for donor funding. If the donor is known to be a bilateral or multilateral organization, then those codes can be used, but if not, we need a more generic code.

@duncandewhurst: Can you provide feedback on these proposed changes?

jpmckinney commented 5 years ago

Related: https://github.com/open-contracting-extensions/european-union/issues/20

jpmckinney commented 5 years ago

There are several fields specific to PPP arrangements (e.g. stepInRights). We can consider instead a new extension, which might introduce a 'superclass' of the Finance object, with fewer properties. (Alternately, we can name the new definition Finance, and have the existing extension extend it….)

duncandewhurst commented 5 years ago

A similar need came up in Belarus where the following additional fields were added:

Field Definition Notes
tender/funds Tender may be hold using budget or own funds
contracts/funds Contract may be signed with budget or own funds used Possible values: Budget -- state funds, Own -- non-state funds (money from individual business)

Helpdesk feedback was to provide this information in planning/budget/description

duncandewhurst commented 5 years ago

Noting that the finance extension was designed to represent individual financing agreements related to funding a PPP project (my understanding is that basically means funding arrangements for the company set up for the project), hence why few of the other fields in the finance extension are applicable to the use case of describing whether the funding for a procurement is from public, private or donor funds.

On that basis I think we should also consider whether a simple codelist field added to either planning/budget, tender and/or contract would be a better solution that adapting the finance extension.

duncandewhurst commented 5 years ago

Belarus actually has more detail than stated above on the finance source for contracts, with the following codelist for financeSource, separate to the funds codelist:

jpmckinney commented 5 years ago

Seems like we might use a pattern like financeType and financeTypeDetails.

yolile commented 3 years ago

We should also add an example of how to use the extension for a process outside PPPs and in the planning section. (CRM-7129)