Open ChucklesOnGitHub opened 4 months ago
I attached the csv files with the recorded timestamps of test#1. I'm using a computer with the following specs: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900KF 3.00 GHz; RAM: 64GB
camera1_test9.csv mini_2_test92024-07-02T13_30_02.csv mini1_test92024-07-02T13_30_02.csv
@NataliacMadeira A couple clarifying questions:
User describes an issue getting reliable 30fps in a setup with two miniscopes and a pointgrey camera being triggered by pycontrol.
Setup: two miniscopes each connected to a BNC port of the pycontrol (BNC-1 and BNC-2). point grey camera connected to a Port (Port-1) to the same pycontrol board. In pycontrol, runs a simple task that sends a HIGH constant TTL pulse (3.3V) for all the devices. To record the videos, I am using a Bonsai workflow (attached). In this workflow, point grey, miniscope 1 and miniscope 2 are configured in a trigger mode, so when the TTL from pycontrol arrives the records start. Ideally, I aim to have the videos from all these different devices at 30FPS. But when connecting two miniscopes at once they don't reach 30 FPS, as per these tests:
1) Both miniscopes and PG camera at 30FPS --> miniscopes doesn't reach 30FPS, PG camera reaches 30FPS 2) Both miniscopes at 25FPS and PG camera at 30FPS --> both miniscopes reach 25FPS and PG camera reaches 30FPS 3) One miniscope at 30FPS and PG camera at 30FPS --> miniscope and PG reach 30FPS
Testing both miniscopes in the Miniscope-DAQ-qt software result: both reach the 30FPS when they are either in trigger mode or not, suggesting this is not a problem with the computer capacity.
Ca2+ imaging - test.zip