This seems very redundant. Why can they not be consolidated? will in be confusing that ConfigureBno055 and Bno055Data is not he same as whatever consolidated class we come up with?
While this could be added on top of existing operators, they would likely be marked as deprecated. For this reason, Im going to change this the the 1.0.0 milestone.
The BNO055 has a unique configuration and data operator for each of the passthrough-based headstage it works with. For example:
https://github.com/open-ephys/onix-bonsai-onix1/blob/3fdcec67f5f5d548ddf9125d7859565b55a48d08/OpenEphys.Onix1/ConfigureNeuropixelsV2eBno055.cs#L11
There are others in
This seems very redundant. Why can they not be consolidated? will in be confusing that
ConfigureBno055
andBno055Data
is not he same as whatever consolidated class we come up with?