search

open-feature / docs.openfeature.dev

OpenFeature Documentation
https://openfeature.dev
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
6 stars 19 forks source link

feat: add 1.0 blog post #160

Closed toddbaert closed 2 years ago

toddbaert commented 2 years ago

Add blog post about 1.0 and spec stabilization.

Direct preview link: https://deploy-preview-160--lucky-creponne-baf9b3.netlify.app/blog

netlify[bot] commented 2 years ago

Deploy Preview for lucky-creponne-baf9b3 ready!

Name Link
Latest commit 2e0e47b3978050097bf63b650938c04444fe339e
Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/lucky-creponne-baf9b3/deploys/63582ef3d7071c000974a8e3
Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-160--lucky-creponne-baf9b3.netlify.app
Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

tcarrio commented 2 years ago

Additionally, this is a preemptive PR, correct? In anticipation of the 1.0 spec release? Asking since I still don't see a 1.0 in the spec repo :slightly_smiling_face:

If 0.5.0 is essentially 1.0 that would be good to know as well

toddbaert commented 2 years ago

Additionally, this is a preemptive PR, correct? In anticipation of the 1.0 spec release? Asking since I still don't see a 1.0 in the spec repo slightly_smiling_face

If 0.5.0 is essentially 1.0 that would be good to know as well

We are not doing a 1.0 release of the spec, but have added hardening labels to certain subsections. Only the mentioned SDKs are 1.0 (2/4 thus far, but hopefully it's 4/4 soon). Should we add clarification on that?

justinabrahms commented 2 years ago

I want to find a 3rd bullet point for the experimental sdk features. Also, "hardening" sounds almost stable but not actually stable. Can it regress? If not, we should find a better name. If so, we should mention it. :)

toddbaert commented 2 years ago

I want to find a 3rd bullet point for the experimental sdk features.

I'm sure I can think of one.

Also, "hardening" sounds almost stable but not actually stable. Can it regress? If not, we should find a better name. If so, we should mention it. :)

The "hardening" language was agreed on here: https://github.com/open-feature/spec/pull/139. It can't be regressed; we agreed we wanted a unidirectional graduation.

I'm open to changing the term if the meaning doesn't change. Any proposals?

@justinabrahms

justinabrahms commented 2 years ago

This works for me. Re read that post and it's about which version number changes on update, which works for me.

toddbaert commented 2 years ago

@justinabrahms

I've added one more point to the experimental features. Right now, we have 4 sections in the SDK, 2 of which are hardening and 2 of which are sill experimental. The point I've added is "experimental context propagation" (passing context attrs on the async continuation or thread-local storage, etc) which is currently only implemented experimentally in the JS-SDK.