Closed toddbaert closed 1 year ago
Could you please add a section that talks about backwards compatibility? I would expect new features to be optional and require the provider developer to explicitly add support for the feature.
I think that's covered by the phrasing:
...be extended to include optional properties that denote which features are available on the implementing provider...
Since all these are optional, we have backwards compatibility.
@beeme1mr
Mostly brought up based on comments in the events OFEP, this OFEP proposes a solution for "feature discovery" in the context of providers, in order to signal to the SDK and
application authors
what features are available in a particular provider.I think this would work well with badges and documentation that consistently identify features and functionality.