search

open-feature / python-sdk-contrib

Community contributions for hooks and reference providers in python
https://openfeature.dev
10 stars 11 forks source link

chore: remove excluded ruff rules and fix issues #32

Closed gruebel closed 8 months ago

gruebel commented 8 months ago

This PR

codecov[bot] commented 8 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (684a90a) 63.44% compared to head (3693d0c) 85.12%. Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
openfeature/contrib/providers/flagd/provider.py 25.00% 3 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #32 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 63.44% 85.12% +21.67% =========================================== Files 8 6 -2 Lines 238 121 -117 =========================================== - Hits 151 103 -48 + Misses 87 18 -69 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-feature/python-sdk-contrib/pull/32/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-feature/python-sdk-contrib/pull/32/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature) | `85.12% <50.00%> (+21.67%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.