search

open-feature / python-sdk-contrib

Community contributions for hooks and reference providers in python
https://openfeature.dev
11 stars 11 forks source link

fix: fix types for hints in OTel TracingHook #73

Closed federicobond closed 7 months ago

federicobond commented 7 months ago

See https://github.com/open-feature/python-sdk-contrib/pull/72#discussion_r1532819584

codecov[bot] commented 7 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 92.99%. Comparing base (d8e10c7) to head (396b739). Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #73 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 90.55% 92.99% +2.43% ========================================== Files 8 9 +1 Lines 180 214 +34 ========================================== + Hits 163 199 +36 + Misses 17 15 -2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-feature/python-sdk-contrib/pull/73/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-feature/python-sdk-contrib/pull/73/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature) | `92.99% <100.00%> (+2.43%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.