feat: implement provider events

federicobond commented 6 months ago

This PR

Adds support for eventing according to the spec. Looking for feedback especially on the public API

Follow-up Tasks

[ ] Improve tests
[ ] Run event handlers with a ThreadPoolExecutor

Fixes: https://github.com/open-feature/python-sdk/pull/278

codecov[bot] commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.16514% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.77%. Comparing base (04b4009) to head (d4420f3).

Files	Patch %	Lines
openfeature/_event_support.py	97.50%	1 Missing :warning:
openfeature/provider/provider.py	91.66%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #278 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 94.19% 94.77% +0.58% ========================================== Files 18 20 +2 Lines 551 651 +100 ========================================== + Hits 519 617 +98 - Misses 32 34 +2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-feature/python-sdk/pull/278/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-feature/python-sdk/pull/278/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature) | `94.77% <98.16%> (+0.58%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-feature#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.