Closed maxnoe closed 4 years ago
This sounds like a good proposal to me. Thoughts by anyone else?
Do you need to verify that the format license does not conflict with the licenses of the any Science Tools using the format?
Another thought: this is supposed to be a prototype for the CTA data format, although it will of course be for CTAO to decide which format they will use. Nevertheless, we should make sure that a license does not prevent CTAO from building upon this work. I'm not an expert on licenses, so I don't know if this could be a problem or not.
Also, see the previous issue #114
Ok, sorry for not checking before opening this one. Seems they came to the same conclusion. BSD for code and CC BY for the license text. I'll open a PR.
For the no-derivatives part, this must probably be dropped, as a PR basically is a modified redistribution.
This project should have a license.
As it is not directly code, CC would probably most approrpiate.
As it is a standard, it should not be modified.
So I would propose CC by Attribution, No-Derivatives: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/