OM test suite

[Mathadon]

@casella suggests to include IDEAS in the OpenModelica test suite https://github.com/open-ideas/IDEAS/issues/1253#issuecomment-1085845104 . I think this is a good idea and I hope to be able to make some time for this? Can you comment on what exactly we'd have to do for this?

[Mathadon]

@sjoelund it is, but you would have to apply it on each and every component.

That indeed would be a bit of a hassle. :)

[casella]

@Mathadon I agree, though I still see a couple minor issues at the library level:

• IDEAS.Buildings.Components.Examples.RectangularZoneExternalSurfaces has a missing each somewhere
• IDEAS.LIDEAS.Examples.BaseClasses.SimInfoManagerInputs fails because it cannot find a text file input in the Resources directory

I guess you can fix them in the library, and then issue a patch release 3.0.1 that works better with OpenModelica than 3.0.0, and will work even better as we fix remaining issues in the tool.

Most other failures in the testsuite are either due to insufficient memory allocated to the test process, see #9038, or to the issue with protected element access, #9059. We'll address them ASAP on our side.

Then there are a few models that fail at initialization, these should be investigated further, maybe later this fall as we currently have to solve similar problems with other libraries (e.g. Buildings) with higher priority. It is possible that those other fixes will have a positive effect on IDEAS as well, we'll see that in regression reports.

[Mathadon]

LIDEAS protected variable access should be fixed through https://github.com/open-ideas/IDEAS/commit/cbd1414602b65f5f02ab8203417726be51ea478c

[casella]

Good, we should see the results tomorrow here.

[Mathadon]

Some more fixes pushed here https://github.com/open-ideas/IDEAS/commit/974f7f6e385ffc4141928aac0be463d07713b5e4

[Mathadon]

More fixes pushed: 73ea45f80bfa26b8d7ef1671f7082fc430a12b7c