Possible Step 3 Markdown improvement

[lithafnium]

Problem

Suggestion:

On step 3, the paragraph that says:

...you will be on your repository < YourUserName >/open-learning-exchange.github.io

and

...rename your repository to < YourUserName >.github.io. See example below.

might be confusing to some people who are new to github as they might not see the <> as place holders.

Steps to reproduce the problem

N/A

Screenshots

N/A

Proposed solution

Change to:

your_user_name/open-learning-exchange.github.io

and

your_user_name.github.io

[iawale]

Maybe adding italics to the < > is also an alternative? But I think that will also go against the placeholder format throughout the First steps.

[irisb1701]

I made a similar suggestion on issue #2453 , but I agree with ChiragAwale, they are already used throughout First Steps, so it might be better to just create a note reminding the reader to not include the angled brackets.

[hkcyf369]

I agree with you that the <>may be confusing to new git users. I agree with irisb1701 that just create a note reminding <> should not be included.

[hemu-codes]

Because I was also initially very confused with this, I think just providing an example link would be the easiest approach.

[lmmrssa]

I don't thin removing <> are required, this is general practice in programming to denote dynamic replaceable values. But yes you can change it to code block and also you can put note on starting somewhere saying if you see <> then that needs to be replaced by your equivalent value for that placeholder.

[lillyxxx]

Since it is common to use angled brackets as place holders, so I agree with @lmmrssa that there's no need to remove it. And in #2453 it shows that on Step 6 - GitHub Issues Tutorial there's notes mentioned that, but Markdown part is before Step 6. And actually, the angled brackets appear somewhere else, so maybe add a small note on the beginning of first steps will be a better solution to resolve all these similar problems.

[pattanawadee88]

I don't think removing angled brackets are necessary. I don't have any problem with <> personally. As programmers, we all know that <> is just an indicator that we have to replace it with something else.

But adding a note would be helpful for some people who are new to programming.

[ewhang5]

I also think that removing <> is necessary. Maybe adding clarification the very first time it shows up would work, but as a programmer, I think that this format makes a lot of sense.