Closed yaobaishen closed 1 month ago
I also try the PointPillar model download from the main-page, the inference result still looks strange. command line:
python demo.py --cfg_file cfgs/nuscenes_models/cbgs_pp_multihead.yaml --ckpt ../model_zoo/nuscenes_models/pp_multihead_nds5823_updated.pth --data_path dataset/nuscenes_mini/samples/LIDAR_TOP/n015-2018-11-21-19-38-26+0800__LIDAR_TOP__1542801004447480.pcd.bin --nuscense_data
visulization:
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.
This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale.
This issue is related to issue 1341, but here we track a different problem. After modify the demo.py a bit in order to run the nuscenses dataset pre-trained model, I get weird inference result. The modification is below, because the nuscenses lidar data has 5 dimensions: ['x', 'y', 'z', 'intensity', 'timestamp'].
And the command line to test CenterPoint model with demo.py. Note: I have added a --nuscense_data flag, and test with a xxx.pcd.bin file from nuscenes_mini.
Here is the inference result, even after I set a score threshold 0.3, there are many abnormal detection boxes:
Could anyone share some insights about how to use the nuscenses dataset pre-trained models? Thanks a lot.