Closed funnelfiasco closed 3 years ago
Great idea, @funnelfiasco. Thanks for jotting this down.
Happy to help, I just looked at some of the comments in Preamble and got all excited about working through them. I <3 community feedback!!
My $.02
I think each person gets ONE Reply (unless they're trolly, of course), we could invite them to our regular calls, if they're keen to participate? "Hi so-and-so, Thanks for commenting in our docs! We're going to work through your comments in our open, biweekly call. It's Tuesdays, starting the week after next (or whatevs)... You can join anytime, here's a link..."
See above, then we resolve comments when we've discussed, taking notes in some open doc (probably the spreadsheet, +1 to Ben's comment about taking notes.)
(so keep notes in a spreadsheet or a text doc) After looking at some of the comments I think there are some that I'd integrate immediately, some that I'd like to discuss with you lot, and some that I would have a rationalization for ignoring. If we use the call to work through them, we can catalogue as one of the three groups and after a bit write a blogpost.
Thanks for your great reply, @LauraHilliger. @funnelfiasco can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he meant for this ticket to signal a more general article outlining a process for reviewing and vetting feedback that any open leader could use for any project in an open organization—not necessarily a specific discussion of our plans for the Open Leadership Definition (collected in #94). But, again, @funnelfiasco can surely correct me.
I don't think there's anything I'd add to what Laura wrote in her recent article, so I'll take this one off the pile.
From a conversation with Ron, Heidi, and Bryan happening right now about how we handle comments on the new Open Leadership Definition.