Open organizations and industrial disruption (Part 1)

[semioticrobotic]

First article in a new series on this subject from @RonMcFarland.

[semioticrobotic]

@RonMcFarland, can you please add details here when you have a moment? Thanks.

[RonMcFarland]

This is a 2-part article on the Open Organization Principle of Adaption in industrial disruption through new technology and cost reduction. I completed the first draft, and it is gone through one edit review by Seth.

[semioticrobotic]

Great! Thanks for the details, @RonMcFarland.

[RonMcFarland]

I also put the next article into the schedule. Still trying to get used to doing this.

[semioticrobotic]

Excellent work, @RonMcFarland. You're doing great and I really appreciate it.

[AmyJuneH]

OSDC moved this into copy editing. To be clear, there were two article submitted in one doc.

[RonMcFarland]

Yes, there are two parts on this subject.

On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:45 PM AmyJune Hineline @.***> wrote:

OSDC moved this into copy editing. To be clear, there were two article submitted in one doc.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/open-organization/editorial/issues/144#issuecomment-1184468548, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7S6ZS7LWDDYCKV76J5RFLVUAKXFANCNFSM53HMIWWA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[AmyJuneH]

Part one is ready for review. Here is the preview link: https://opensource.com/preview-link/node/70139/a26c61a5-d6e2-47b5-bc6f-f5d7ff44c6c9

I also will email this to Ron, thanks.

[RonMcFarland]

Here are some comments...... 1.  In the first page, "Could a such community be formed?".  In think, "such a ...." is better.

2. In  "3. Use of solar power generation over nuclear power generation", I think, "Here are some consideration for solar power generation:" should be "considerations".

3. In this sentence, "Solar now regularly provides 20-35% of Germany's power through solar power.", "through solar power" can be deleted.

Other than these small changes, the article looks great to me.

[AmyJuneH]

CHanges made, thanks.

Live URL will be: https://opensource.com/open-organization/22/8/energy-disruption

Set to publish ~August 8

[semioticrobotic]

Thanks, all! I'm not sure "Open Organizations" needs to be capitalized in the headline. We don't typically invoke it as a proper noun unless we're talking about the project or the community ("the Open Organization project," etc.). The same is true in instances like "Assume we want to build an Open Organization Community to introduce three things:"—here Ron isn't speaking of the Open Organization community, but rather the common-noun concept of an open organization community.

A minor nit to pick, perhaps. But it's the only thing I can offer when everything else looks good!

Thanks!

[AmyJuneH]

Thanks! I'll get those changes in. I will have Lauren change the title (I am ok making the other edits.)

[AmyJuneH]

This has been published: How open organizations can harness energy disruptions https://opensource.com/open-organization/22/8/energy-disruption?sc_cid=7016000000127ECAAY

[semioticrobotic]

Promotion checklist

• [x] Discourse
• [x] Twitter
• [ ] LinkedIn

[semioticrobotic]

Thanks for your great work, @AmyJuneH and @RonMcFarland!

[AmyJuneH]

I dont see the part 2 card. I'll put both URLS here

Saving home energy using open organization principles (part one) https://opensource.com/open-organization/22/9/saving-home-energy-open-organization-principles set to publish ~Sept 5

Applying open organization principles to save factory energy (part 2) https://opensource.com/open-organization/22/9/saving-factory-energy-open-organization-principles Set to publish ~Sept 6

[semioticrobotic]

Thanks, @AmyJuneH! They're both sitting in Awaiting Final Approvals. But now that we're all set, I'll attached the links and get them moving along. Appreciate it!