Closed semioticrobotic closed 1 year ago
This is ready for review, here is the preview link Community thinking patterns and the role of the introducer-in-chief Link: https://opensource.com/preview-link/node/70409/53d5f166-825c-4ba1-9e12-b051a6b2401d
Hi AmyJune,
In general, this article looks great.
Notice the sentence, "According to the researchers, you can identify people who want to improve their situation and are willing to work on it. You convince these people that they have the choice to improve themselves and their situation." It might be better if it went something like this. "According to the researchers, you have to identify people who want to improve their situation and are willing to work on it. Then, you convince these people that they have the choice to improve themselves and their situation."
I think this small change might be better. Otherwise, it's great and ready to go.
Thanks,
Ron
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 11:48 PM AmyJune Hineline @.***> wrote:
This is ready for review, here is the preview link Community thinking patterns and the role of the introducer-in-chief Link: https://opensource.com/preview-link/node/70409/53d5f166-825c-4ba1-9e12-b051a6b2401d
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/open-organization/editorial/issues/153#issuecomment-1384170919, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7S6ZUCZ3QPSOICP4PAHLTWSVNUFANCNFSM6AAAAAATFUHJLQ . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
Note, this is part 1 only. I don't see a reviewed and edited version of part 2 yet.
Apologies, this is part one. I'll reference these comments in card #149
Part two was published and socail media is scheduled for around 1pm tomorrow https://opensource.com/article/23/2/community-thinking-pattern
AmyJune,
I just read the article, even put it a comment and I think it is great.
Notice at the bottom: This paragraph appears twice and one should be deleted.
"What community are you in?
In your working environment, think about its greater purpose, and consider listening quality, problem-solving quality, ongoing job support, and participation level. Rank those factors from one to four and consider where development is needed. On average, a 3.5 would indicate a competitive thinking pattern #3 community and 4.5 an internally collaborative thinking pattern #4 community. To confirm the group thinking pattern level, also ask yourself what general feeling sticks out among most members:
Armed with that information, consider what action is required."
Could you delete the above one?
Also, in the sentence, "Bob studies a spare computer there in the company during his spare time." Could you add the word "on"? Bob studies on a spare computer there in the company during his spare time.
Furthermore, in the sentence, "Consider listing quality, problem-solving quality, ongoing job support, and participation level.", could you change "listing" to "membership listening"?
Overall, I really like this article and think the much improved "Community thinking patterns in action" really brings the content alive.
Cheers,
Ron
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 11:53 PM AmyJune Hineline @.***> wrote:
Part two was published and socail media is scheduled for around 1pm tomorrow https://opensource.com/article/23/2/community-thinking-pattern
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/open-organization/editorial/issues/153#issuecomment-1412189149, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7S6ZTQ3ZL5RMRST4RSI6TWVJ2HJANCNFSM6AAAAAATFUHJLQ . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
Great! Changes made
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:00 AM AmyJune Hineline @.***> wrote:
Great! Changes made
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/open-organization/editorial/issues/153#issuecomment-1413880886, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7S6ZW4YHU4YYAYOVZ72TLWVPDXVANCNFSM6AAAAAATFUHJLQ . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
AmyJune,
I just had a quick look at the article. A couple comments....
What community are you in?
In your working environment, think about its greater purpose, and consider membership listening quality, problem-solving quality, ongoing job support, and participation level. Rank those factors from one to four and consider where development is needed. On average, a 3.5 would indicate a competitive thinking pattern #3 community and 4.5 an internally collaborative thinking pattern #4 community. To confirm the group thinking pattern level, also ask yourself what general feeling sticks out among most members:
Armed with that information, consider what action is required.
it seems the below one was deleted and the above one remained. That is the conclusion of the article, so could you move it to the end?
Other than that, looks great to me.
Ron
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:09 AM Ronald McFarland @.***> wrote:
Thanks!
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 12:00 AM AmyJune Hineline @.***> wrote:
Great! Changes made
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/open-organization/editorial/issues/153#issuecomment-1413880886, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF7S6ZW4YHU4YYAYOVZ72TLWVPDXVANCNFSM6AAAAAATFUHJLQ . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>
Thanks, @AmyJuneH and @RonMcFarland! I'll begin promoting next week.
Part 2 of series from Ron McFarland.