Closed semioticrobotic closed 5 years ago
Amarachi notes that integrating open source practices into curriculum development is key to making that curriculum adaptable for different students. What are some of these practices? What is the relationship between these practices and a moldable curriculum?
Although it is easy to see the advantages of personalizing computer science curricula through what Amarachi calls the “back-and-forth” iterative process of curriculum development, would this kind of process work at your own organization? What are some roadblocks that educators at your organization might face if they try this kind of process?
Amarachi explains that working with an adaptable computer science curriculum is especially important when teaching students who are traditionally underrepresented in the field of computer science. What do you think is the connection between a curriculum’s adaptability and the level of engagement from such students? What are some examples of times you have experienced, either as an educator or a student, a disconnect between a curriculum and a student population?
Proposed chapter from Amarachi Achonu: