search

open-organization / open-org-workbook

Repository for open organization community's workbook
56 stars 13 forks source link

Incorrect sentence in Jason Hibbets' chapter #36

Open semioticrobotic opened 6 years ago

semioticrobotic commented 6 years ago

On page 320, in Step 7, appears the following text:

After the pitches, give all participants three votes to select the topic(s) they are most interested in discussing or exploring further. Have them vote on the pitch paper, using tickmarks, with the markers or pens. Alternatively, you can "dot" vote with circular stickers. Votes can spread out or stacked for preferred topics. Allow up to 10 minutes for this step."

The sentence "Votes can spread out or stacked for preferred topics" needs to be re-written for clarity.

jhibbets commented 6 years ago

Votes can spread out or stacked for preferred topics, meaning, participants can vote for three different topics, they can vote for two topics by stacking two votes on one topic, or they can vote for one topic by placing all three votes on one topic.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Bryan Behrenshausen < notifications@github.com> wrote:

On page 320, in Step 7, appears the following text:

After the pitches, give all participants three votes to select the topic(s) they are most interested in discussing or exploring further. Have them vote on the pitch paper, using tickmarks, with the markers or pens. Alternatively, you can "dot" vote with circular stickers. Votes can spread out or stacked for preferred topics. Allow up to 10 minutes for this step."

The sentence "Votes can spread out or stacked for preferred topics" needs to be re-written for clarity.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/open-organization-ambassadors/open-org-workbook/issues/36, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADgoV6Awdf_0AHaFxaAHb1T7-11b3dtJks5tcC8ogaJpZM4Sg_S- .

semioticrobotic commented 6 years ago

Thanks for this, @jhibbets! I assumed that's what it meant. I just wanted to make sure future iterations of the book have added clarity. Appreciate it.