Open anderseknert opened 10 months ago
This issue has been automatically marked as inactive because it has not had any activity in the last 30 days. Although currently inactive, the issue could still be considered and actively worked on in the future. More details about the use-case this issue attempts to address, the value provided by completing it or possible solutions to resolve it would help to prioritize the issue.
As far as I can tell, this test excercises all possible code paths (as there is only one, really). The test coverage reported is however only 75%, as line 5 (
foo if {
) is considered not covered. This despite the line in the body reported as being covered. Changing this to use one-liner style:Has coverage reported as 100%, despite being the same thing covered (!) in some syntax sugar.