Fix problem of generating dataset when having `reaction_id` in the template (#697)

[FanwangM]

The PR is an attempt to fix #697 by filtering out the line with reaction_id.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #699 (17effeb) into main (4961279) will increase coverage by 0.02%. Report is 1 commits behind head on main. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #699      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.33%   69.36%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        2322     2324       +2     
  Branches      589      590       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1610     1612       +2     
  Misses        598      598              
  Partials      114      114              

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
ord_schema/templating.py	95.31% <100.00%> (+0.15%)	:arrow_up:

[FanwangM]

Instead of doing string operations on the template pbtxt, it would be cleaner to remove the field from the dataset after it is generated by the enumeration, I think. WDYT?

This can be a cleaner solution. New changes are committed here.

One question, do we need to assign a reaction_id for each reaction in the database after the reaction list is constructed?

[connorcoley]

One question, do we need to assign a reaction_id for each reaction in the database after the reaction list is constructed?

No, the submission workflows will automatically assign a reaction_id to each