As a consequence, I guesses that also the implementation of fleet_adapter_template shouldn't be compatible with free_fleet.
Are there any update on that? Something changed in the last 2 years?
Implementation Considerations
Taking into account the Description part, I still tried to implement a pipeline that includes both free_fleet and rmf_demos_fleet_adapter.
One possible solution that I found is the implementation of a publisher in free_fleet_server. This will allow us to update the location and path of each robot in the topic /robot_state, in order to keep publishing waypoints sequentially and respecting the execution time.
Thank you to take into consideration this request and let me know if you are open to a PR to fix this.
Before proceeding, is there an existing issue or discussion for this?
Description
Hi All!
As mentioned in #121, free_fleet seems not to be compatible with rmf_demos_fleet_adapter.
As a consequence, I guesses that also the implementation of fleet_adapter_template shouldn't be compatible with free_fleet.
Are there any update on that? Something changed in the last 2 years?
Implementation Considerations
Taking into account the Description part, I still tried to implement a pipeline that includes both free_fleet and rmf_demos_fleet_adapter.
One possible solution that I found is the implementation of a publisher in free_fleet_server. This will allow us to update the location and path of each robot in the topic /robot_state, in order to keep publishing waypoints sequentially and respecting the execution time.
Thank you to take into consideration this request and let me know if you are open to a PR to fix this.
Alternatives
No response
Additional information
No response