Open jlacivita opened 1 year ago
The spec for Components object says:
This object MAY be extended with Specification Extensions.
However, the schema does not allow for this:
"components": { "title": "components", "type": "object", "properties": { "schemas": { "title": "schemaComponents", "type": "object", "patternProperties": { "[0-z]+": { "$ref": "#/definitions/JSONSchema" } } }, "links": { "title": "linkComponents", "type": "object", "patternProperties": { "[0-z]+": { "$ref": "#/definitions/linkObject" } } }, "errors": { "title": "errorComponents", "type": "object", "patternProperties": { "[0-z]+": { "$ref": "#/definitions/errorObject" } } }, "examples": { "title": "exampleComponents", "type": "object", "patternProperties": { "[0-z]+": { "$ref": "#/definitions/exampleObject" } } }, "examplePairings": { "title": "examplePairingComponents", "type": "object", "patternProperties": { "[0-z]+": { "$ref": "#/definitions/examplePairingObject" } } }, "contentDescriptors": { "title": "contentDescriptorComponents", "type": "object", "patternProperties": { "[0-z]+": { "$ref": "#/definitions/contentDescriptorObject" } } }, "tags": { "title": "tagComponents", "type": "object", "patternProperties": { "[0-z]+": { "$ref": "#/definitions/tagObject" } } } } }
Is this a bug, or a copy/paste error in the spec?
Supporting x- extensions in the components object would be quite useful for storing specific types of reusable objects that are domain-specific.
x-
Welcome to OpenRPC! Thank you for taking the time to create an issue. Please review the guidelines
That makes a lot of sense to me, thanks for the suggestion.
do you want to make a PR / issue on meta-schema?
The spec for Components object says:
However, the schema does not allow for this:
Is this a bug, or a copy/paste error in the spec?
Supporting
x-
extensions in the components object would be quite useful for storing specific types of reusable objects that are domain-specific.