First draft of device failure prediction WG charter

[dmick]

Signed-off-by: Dan Mick dmick@redhat.com

[sesheta]

Hi @dmick. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a open-services-group member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[erikerlandson]

cc @MichaelClifford @Shreyanand

[erikerlandson]

/hold

[erikerlandson]

/ok-to-test

[MichaelClifford]

/LGTM

[erikerlandson]

/unhold

[erikerlandson]

@dmick can you change name of the directory to wg-device-failure-prediction? The WG directories all start with wg-

[erikerlandson]

@dmick also we need an entry under the workinggroups section here: https://github.com/open-services-group/community/blob/main/sigs.yaml#L143

[erikerlandson]

@dmick also it looks like I was wrong, we just need to list the orgs in "stakeholders"

[erikerlandson]

/hold

[Shreyanand]

/lgtm

[chauhankaranraj]

/lgtm

[sesheta]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: schwesig

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/open-services-group/community/blob/main/OWNERS)~~ [schwesig] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[sesheta]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[dmick]

Updated with Erik's comments, and added github configuration

[erikerlandson]

@Shreyanand can you add @dmick as a org member, to satisfy peribolos?

[dmick]

ping @Shreyanand

[Shreyanand]

/retest

[Shreyanand]

@harshad16 @tumido how can we fix the peribolos test here?

[harshad16]

as there is a new team creation, the peribolos should be overridden, as it cant do a dry run of the creation of the team. the owner has to done override by using following command:

/override peribolos

[sesheta]

@harshad16: Overrode contexts on behalf of harshad16: peribolos

In response to [this](https://github.com/open-services-group/community/pull/124#issuecomment-1102912648): >as there is a new team creation, the peribolos should be overridden, as it cant do a dry run of the creation of the team. >the owner has to done override by using following command: > >/override peribolos Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes/test-infra](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[Shreyanand]

/unhold /approve

[harshad16]

/verify-owners /unhold

[dmick]

The bots have been venerated properly! Hurrah!