Open Kreijstal opened 2 years ago
The idea itself is technically interesting but I don't think it's worth the effort :
Considering those facts, there would be no real benefit of creating an automated repository reviver, because the only way to revive a project is to actually maintain a fork, which is better done without such tool.
May be related: https://github.com/acsone/git-aggregator
May be related: https://github.com/acsone/git-aggregator
that is pretty impressive
Stale github repo Reviver
There are some repos where mantainers simply died, but helpful people have made multiple pull requests that would be useful to have in unison. It would be a shame to let all that work go to waste, but it's hard on the github interface to fork and merge various pull requests, so a tool would be nice, what I imagine is a web-tool like https://techgaun.github.io/active-forks/index.html the user selects the forks that wants to merge "in his own fork", and the output would be either:
alternatively, and probably less aggressively, this would be useful to find out how two pull requests work together if they were merged.
Relevant Technology
git
Complexity and required time
Complexity
Required time (ETA)
Categories