open-space-collective / open-space-toolkit-astrodynamics

Flight profile, orbit, attitude, access.
https://open-space-collective.github.io/open-space-toolkit-astrodynamics/
Apache License 2.0
58 stars 14 forks source link

build: update core ~4.1, math~4.2, physics ~10.1 #449

Closed vishwa2710 closed 1 month ago

vishwa2710 commented 1 month ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the version specifications of several dependencies listed in the bindings/python/requirements.txt file. Specifically, the versions for open-space-toolkit-core, open-space-toolkit-mathematics, and open-space-toolkit-physics have been incremented to newer versions, while open-space-toolkit-io remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
bindings/python/requirements.txt Updated open-space-toolkit-core from ~4.0 to ~4.1, open-space-toolkit-mathematics from ~4.1 to ~4.2, and open-space-toolkit-physics from ~10.0 to ~10.1. open-space-toolkit-io remains at ~4.0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant System
    User->>System: Request to update dependencies
    System->>System: Check current versions
    System->>System: Update open-space-toolkit-core to ~4.1
    System->>System: Update open-space-toolkit-mathematics to ~4.2
    System->>System: Update open-space-toolkit-physics to ~10.1
    System->>User: Confirm updates completed

🐇 "In the garden, we hop and play,
New versions bloom, hip-hip-hooray!
Dependencies fresh, like morning dew,
With every change, we grow anew!
Let's leap with joy, for progress is here,
A world of updates, we hold so dear!" 🌼


📜 Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**
📥 Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee261aace4896a45049d5681f2c6e3b1c6dc2a3a and a5eb63c7add3a017d962ded4e07b80714b1794b2.
📒 Files selected for processing (1) * bindings/python/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
bindings/python/requirements.txt (5)
Line range hint `1-7`: **Overall changes look good.** The updates to the dependency versions are consistent with the PR objectives. The file structure and formatting have been maintained. Please ensure to verify compatibility with the updated toolkits as suggested in the previous comments. --- `6-6`: **LGTM. Verify compatibility with the updated physics toolkit.** The update of `open-space-toolkit-physics` from ~10.0 to ~10.1 is a minor version bump, which should maintain backwards compatibility. However, it's advisable to verify that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes in your project. To ensure compatibility, please run the following script to check for any potential issues: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-physics # Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.physics echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.physics:" rg --type python "from open_space_toolkit import physics" || echo "No direct imports found." # Test: Search for usage of physics module echo "Checking usage of physics module:" rg --type python "physics\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of physics module found." # Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended. ``` --- `3-3`: **LGTM. Verify compatibility with the updated core toolkit.** The update of `open-space-toolkit-core` from ~4.0 to ~4.1 is a minor version bump, which should maintain backwards compatibility. However, it's advisable to verify that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes in your project. To ensure compatibility, please run the following script to check for any potential issues: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-core # Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.core echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.core:" rg --type python "from open_space_toolkit import core" || echo "No direct imports found." # Test: Search for usage of core module echo "Checking usage of core module:" rg --type python "core\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of core module found." # Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended. ``` --- `4-4`: **Verify if `open-space-toolkit-io` needs an update.** While other dependencies have been updated, `open-space-toolkit-io` remains at version ~4.0. Could you please verify if this dependency also needs an update, or if there's a specific reason for keeping it at the current version? To check for the latest version of `open-space-toolkit-io`, you can run: --- `5-5`: **LGTM. Verify compatibility with the updated mathematics toolkit.** The update of `open-space-toolkit-mathematics` from ~4.1 to ~4.2 is a minor version bump, which should maintain backwards compatibility. However, it's advisable to verify that this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes in your project. To ensure compatibility, please run the following script to check for any potential issues:
✅ Verification successful **LGTM. Compatibility with the updated mathematics toolkit verified.** No direct imports of `open_space_toolkit.mathematics` were found. The usage of the `mathematics` module in test files indicates that the update should maintain compatibility. Nevertheless, thorough testing is recommended.
🏁 Scripts executed The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-mathematics # Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics:" rg --type python "from open_space_toolkit import mathematics" || echo "No direct imports found." # Test: Search for usage of mathematics module echo "Checking usage of mathematics module:" rg --type python "mathematics\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of mathematics module found." # Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended. ``` Length of output: 663 --- Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Re-check for potential compatibility issues with the updated open-space-toolkit-mathematics # Test: Search for imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics echo "Checking imports of open_space_toolkit.mathematics:" rg --type py "from open_space_toolkit\.mathematics" || echo "No direct imports found." # Test: Search for usage of mathematics module echo "Checking usage of mathematics module:" rg --type py "mathematics\." -A 3 || echo "No usage of mathematics module found." # Note: These checks provide a starting point. Thorough testing is recommended. ``` Length of output: 8059
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 90.92%. Comparing base (57f7d7c) to head (a5eb63c). Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #449 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 90.92% 90.92% ======================================= Files 85 85 Lines 8618 8618 ======================================= Hits 7836 7836 Misses 782 782 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.