[repo] Add Linux ARM64 to actions CI

[ysolomchenko]

Partially fixes https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/issues/1859

Changes

Add otel-linux-arm64 to actions CI

Merge requirement checklist

• [x] CONTRIBUTING guidelines followed (license requirements, nullable enabled, static analysis, etc.)
• [ ] Unit tests added/updated
• [ ] Appropriate CHANGELOG.md files updated for non-trivial changes
• [ ] Changes in public API reviewed (if applicable)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 86.34%. Comparing base (6250307) to head (cd7d3ff). Report is 311 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #5824 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 83.38% 86.34% +2.95% ========================================== Files 297 257 -40 Lines 12531 11152 -1379 ========================================== - Hits 10449 9629 -820 + Misses 2082 1523 -559 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry) | `?` | | | [unittests-Project-Experimental](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry) | `86.19% <ø> (?)` | | | [unittests-Project-Stable](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry) | `86.26% <ø> (?)` | | | [unittests-Solution](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry) | `86.00% <ø> (?)` | | | [unittests-UnstableCoreLibraries-Experimental](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry) | `85.76% <ø> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 215 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet/pull/5824/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=open-telemetry)

[ysolomchenko]

@reyang, there is also the possibility of adding Windows ARM to our CI. Should we do it?

[reyang]

@reyang, there is also the possibility of adding Windows ARM to our CI. Should we do it?

Yeah, that would be nice! (we're seeing more users on mobile, ARM64 servers, etc.)