open-telemetry / opentelemetry-specification

Specifications for OpenTelemetry
https://opentelemetry.io
Apache License 2.0
3.71k stars 887 forks source link

Project Tracking: OpenTelemetry configuration #2920

Closed codeboten closed 5 months ago

codeboten commented 1 year ago

Description

OpenTelemetry specifies code that can operate in a variety of ways based on the end-user’s desired mode of operation. This requires a configuration interface be provided to the user so they are able to communicate this information. Currently, OpenTelemetry specifies this interface in the form of environment variables. This environment variable interface is limited in the structure of information it can communicate and the primitives it can support.

The configuration project intends to produce the specification around the data model for language-agnostic configuration that provides additional flexibility for the end users.

Project Board

https://github.com/orgs/open-telemetry/projects/38

Deliverables

  1. An OTEP
  2. Prototypes in Java, Python, Go, Erlang
  3. The specification of the configuration data model
  4. A repository containing the schema and schema validation tooling

Staffing / Help Wanted

End users of OpenTelemetry to help validate the usage and configuration scenarios would be great to have participate in the discussions.

Required staffing

Project lead
Sponsoring TC members
Engineers contributing to the working group
Maintainers and approvers

Meeting Times

Every 2 weeks, on Fridays at 10:30AM PT

Timeline

3-6 months

Labels

The tracking issue should be properly labeled to indicate what parts of the specification it is focused on.

Linked Issues and PRs

All PRs, Issues, and OTEPs related to the project should link back to the tracking issue, so that they can be easily found.

srikanthccv commented 1 year ago

In Python SIG, we discussed implementing something like Django settings.py for configuration but put it on hold since this idea surfaced. I will be glad to participate in this effort and help the group.

svrnm commented 1 year ago

As mentioned on #1773 I am very interested in this topic and happy to participate. I will not be able to attend calls on Fridays, but hopefully there will be some means for asynch communication!

carlosalberto commented 1 year ago

I'd like to sponsor this project as a TC member.

dyladan commented 1 year ago

Added to calendar.

Doc link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uNgWQLQZcSVfBLRXfW9XCVJmKa5NH9R15fSOXhmpGWw/edit Zoom link in the doc and calendar invite (don't want to paste here in case bots find it)

codeboten commented 1 year ago

Thank you @dyladan!

CodeBlanch commented 1 year ago

@codeboten I'm interested in joining the working group and can help contribute a .NET prototype (probably will collaborate with @alanwest on it).

lalitb commented 1 year ago

no-code configuration would be the requirement for the OpenTelemetry C++ to support dynamic loading of SDK. I can help in prototyping for C++ (though it is not mentioned as part of deliverables).

jeremydvoss commented 1 year ago

Does this project include configuration extendibility for vendor specific items? For instance, will Azure be able to configure Connection String and Lightstep configure their access token through this schema?

tedsuo commented 5 months ago

Closing as we have moved to project files and project boards as our way of defining and tracking projects.