Closed joaopgrassi closed 2 years ago
@cartermp, thoughts on how this should be phrased?
@joaopgrassi would you be open to fix that for all the OTLP exporters?
@svrnm yes, I can send a PR to fix all the others, once we agree on the sentence.
@joaopgrassi thanks!
@chalin , @cartermp I am also wondering if this would be something we could fix via a short code or other mechanisms? so have that repeated text stored away somewhere
Regarding this proposed sentence:
This library allows to export telemetry data in the OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP) format to the OpenTelemetry Collector and OTLP-compliant backends/receivers
I would propose something similar, just with one word change 🙂
This library allows exporting telemetry data in the OpenTelemetry Protocol (OTLP) format to the OpenTelemetry Collector and OTLP-compliant backends/receivers
I'll open a PR fixing all registry entries in the upcoming day(s). Feel free to assign this to me if you want :)
What needs to be changed? I noticed that the description used in the OTLP exporter entries (e.g. the Java one) in the registry is not accurate. It says:
It's not accurate because OTLP exporters also allow sending data to other places outside the collector (e.g., directly to an o11y back-end).
What is the name + path of the page that needs changed?
content/en/registry/exporter-{lang}-otlp
Additional context I initially spotted and discussed it here https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry.io/pull/1792#discussion_r984521837
Suggestion: @svrnm suggested in the PR above to use something like: