[x] Did you run the analyzer with the --dev flag to get more information?
[x] Did you create a minimal reproduction in the playground?
Expected behavior
Hello guys :)
I was doing some refactoring on the Lit project I'm working on, and I found a little issue.
Let's say I have a base class B with an abstract public method open, and a derived class D that implement it.
Then I create a second derived class D2, and I want the method in D2 to not be public;
so I change the base method in B from public to protected.
This way, I would expect that D would expose a public open, while in D2 I would leave it as protected.
Checklist
--devflag to get more information?Expected behavior Hello guys :) I was doing some refactoring on the Lit project I'm working on, and I found a little issue.
Let's say I have a base class
Bwith an abstract public methodopen, and a derived classDthat implement it. Then I create a second derived classD2, and I want the method inD2to not be public; so I change the base method inBfrom public to protected. This way, I would expect thatDwould expose a public open, while inD2I would leave it as protected.However, the public modifier from
Dis not taken into account when the manifest is created and the method is always marked as protected. I created a little demo here: https://github.com/DavideMininni-Fincons/custom-element-manifest-demo/tree/main