Closed calebdwilliams closed 1 year ago
I believe this is an improvement either way, but would love for either @muratcorlu or @hrmcdonald to let me know if this fixed any weirdness on their ends before merging. If I don't hear anything by tomorrow morning I'll go ahead and merge this.
@calebdwilliams I tested this code within our project and now all validation and custom message logic look working very well to me. 😊
Please release the latest changes once you merge this so we can use them right away.
I believe this is an improvement either way, but would love for either @muratcorlu or @hrmcdonald to let me know if this fixed any weirdness on their ends before merging. If I don't hear anything by tomorrow morning I'll go ahead and merge this.
Sorry for the late response, I'll check things out tonight! If y'all get anything merged and I have a scenario this doesn't cover I can open up a different issue for whatever that might be.
@muratcorlu Perfect. I'll count this as working then. @hrmcdonald if you have any other issues, please feel free to open a separate thread, but it looks like the initial issue is fully resolved now so I'll merge this and close out that issue.
Thanks y'all!
I definitely would like this tested, should related to #39