Closed bsjones closed 11 years ago
Hi Harry,
just some license confusion (sorcer will appear on the Fedora spin if we get it in in time). The following is from the review. Is this GPLv3+ or GPLv2+?
Ta
Brendan
[@]: License field in the package spec file seems to match the actual license, but frankly how it's documented is a mess:
spec file: GPLv3+
(LICENSE text: GPLv2)
README: "This is released under GPLv3.", but then "you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
License, or (at your option) any later version." faust/main.dsp: GPLv3+ faust/main.cpp: LGPLv2+ gui/avtk: GPLv2+
Pushed commits just now that update all my code to GPLv3+.
The only exception is faust/main.cpp, which contains library code from the FAUST authors: the licenses of each library component are documented on https://github.com/harryhaaren/openAV-Sorcer/blob/18e68914f2ae19dff01d77ce263a42c31041d0cc/faust/main.cpp#L475
GPLv3+ for Sorcer, only the genreated faust/main.cpp has parts which are under different licenses.
As with the other 2 can I get a LICENSE file in the root of the source tree?
thanks Harry,
Brendan