search

openBackhaul / alarms

Centralized representation of alarms
Apache License 2.0
2 stars 0 forks source link

"resource-group-description" erroneously mandatory? #14

Open michbin opened 1 year ago

michbin commented 1 year ago

In revision 2023-10-05 of the alarms-1-0 model, the resource-group-description attribute in the severity-configuration-type grouping has been made mandatory which is in line with issue #10.

My assumption is however that the intention was to make the resource-list attribute mandatory, similar to other groupings (current-alarm-type, alarm-event-record-type, alarm-behavior-type) and as implied by the comment in issue https://github.com/openBackhaul/alarms/issues/10#issuecomment-1630340523. (The resource-group-description attribute is only informational and thus plain text.)

openBackhaul commented 1 year ago

Decision during the 5G xhaul call on 8th of November 2023: "Not yet defined." shall be added as a default value at the AlarmConfiguration::SeverityConfigurationType::resourceGroupDescription attribute. (This is done for the UML2YANG tool not to add the mandatory statement during translating.)