Closed dthiex closed 2 years ago
Looks good to me, but I support Daniel's change requests.
@jdries Would you be okay with the suggestions in my comment?
Yes! I may need to look a bit further
I took the liberty of extending Daniel's pull request to come to a first draft of a harmonized collection spec. I mostly limited myself to the things that I think are agreed upon already, so that we can quickly approve and have at least something on the web page.
Thanks a lot for adding some substance to this. Let's wait for someone from EODC to look at this and then merge it to have an initial version out and improve on it when necessary.
@dthiex agree with your proposal for angles as well. Will you extend it with the other angles? (I added some placeholders.)
Will you extend it with the other angles? (I added some placeholders.)
@jdries Not sure what exactly you mean here. How I see it, we use both the exact angles for sunAzimuth
and sunZenith
so I think there is no generalisation needed here so I'd say we can remove those from here.
This is fine for EODC, you can go ahead. Please let us know if you need any more information.
@jdries Not sure what exactly you mean here. How I see it, we use both the exact angles for
sunAzimuth
andsunZenith
so I think there is no generalisation needed here so I'd say we can remove those from here.
@dthiex indeed, so we only need to add the harmonized names, and explain that these are in fact the exact angles. I think we can merge after that.
@jdries @m-mohr You are too fast for me... Thanks 🙇
@m-mohr @dthiex @ValentinaHutter @christophreimer @bschumac I took the liberty of extending Daniel's pull request to come to a first draft of a harmonized collection spec. I mostly limited myself to the things that I think are agreed upon already, so that we can quickly approve and have at least something on the web page.