You can find in "governance/tree/RC_ReviewProcess_01/Review Process/Review Documents" a pdf with a simplified schema of the Revision and Review processes.
In the meeting we have scheduled for the 21st of May I expect we can discuss what is reflected in it.
In the current ‘Review Process’ document we have assumed that the reviewers are all committers, so all of them have the right permissions to push changes and make comments. The flow described in the document is what Klaus-Rüdiger Hase has highlighted in some opened issues as a ‘Revision Process’; so, the ‘Review Process’ itself shall be defined separately to allow any person to report an issue using the ‘issue tracker’ tool.
I agree with Klaus in this subject and I expect we can reach a common view about both processes so we can close the corresponding documents.
Thank you
Dear all,
You can find in "governance/tree/RC_ReviewProcess_01/Review Process/Review Documents" a pdf with a simplified schema of the Revision and Review processes. In the meeting we have scheduled for the 21st of May I expect we can discuss what is reflected in it.
In the current ‘Review Process’ document we have assumed that the reviewers are all committers, so all of them have the right permissions to push changes and make comments. The flow described in the document is what Klaus-Rüdiger Hase has highlighted in some opened issues as a ‘Revision Process’; so, the ‘Review Process’ itself shall be defined separately to allow any person to report an issue using the ‘issue tracker’ tool.
I agree with Klaus in this subject and I expect we can reach a common view about both processes so we can close the corresponding documents. Thank you
Ainhoa