If we are to take a decision on methods and tools, it must be on an objective base, i.e. compliance on the criterias.
That compliance must be quantified somehow (for instance rated on a scale x/100). That rating has to be justified, so that it can be assessed by others.
Of course, we can decide to give different weight to Different criterias, and even to combine languages and tools to obtain a best-of-breed method (for instance, ERTMSFormalSpecs doesn't include formal proof -> if combined With another approach enabling proof, it could score more).
Looking forward to your feedback, I wish you an excellent evening.
Criterias should be quantified
If we are to take a decision on methods and tools, it must be on an objective base, i.e. compliance on the criterias.
That compliance must be quantified somehow (for instance rated on a scale x/100). That rating has to be justified, so that it can be assessed by others.
Of course, we can decide to give different weight to Different criterias, and even to combine languages and tools to obtain a best-of-breed method (for instance, ERTMSFormalSpecs doesn't include formal proof -> if combined With another approach enabling proof, it could score more).
Looking forward to your feedback, I wish you an excellent evening.
Very kind regards
Stan