search

openETCS / modeling

WP3 Top Level Project: to cover all tasks related with modeling
31 stars 42 forks source link

MA at change to level 2 #916

Closed stefan-karg closed 8 years ago

stefan-karg commented 8 years ago

The behaviour of the DMI would be more realistic, if the Level NTC-"MA" and the profiles would be delivered by the TrackAtlas itself and not via the constants. The first L2-MA would then extend the MA, which would avoid an empty planning area on the DMI.

JakobGartner commented 8 years ago

I think that this would not really change the behaviour, as the DMI has a specific behaviour when in ATB mode (as seen on the video)- the planning area for example is empty in NTC.

But I will look at that, have more urgent issues now so put at prio #3 (at least until tomorrows grooming)

On 16 Nov 2015, at 10:32, Stefan Karg notifications@github.com wrote:

The behaviour of the DMI would be more realistic, if the Level NTC-"MA" and the profiles would be delivered by the TrackAtlas itself and not via the constants. The first L2-MA would then extend the MA, which would avoid an empty planning area on the DMI.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/openETCS/modeling/issues/916.

JakobGartner commented 8 years ago

We have to discard this issue as this would require integration of NTC behaviour to make it consistent with the track data and also with the SRS.

We can argue that NTC was out of project scope.

Please close.

stefan-karg commented 8 years ago

Agreed.