There are multiple issues here. First, the regular expressions for
extracting package names from tarballs use "(.*)" instead of "(.+)".
And second, the get_file function prints a message indicating that
it will skip files it can't find, but then happily proceeds to generate
invalid spec and changes files.
Yes, the next alone should take care of the problem too. But i
think it makes sense to be as defensive as possible considering
the lack of tests.
There are multiple issues here. First, the regular expressions for extracting package names from tarballs use "(.*)" instead of "(.+)". And second, the
get_filefunction prints a message indicating that it will skip files it can't find, but then happily proceeds to generate invalid spec and changes files.Yes, the
nextalone should take care of the problem too. But i think it makes sense to be as defensive as possible considering the lack of tests.