Closed lnussel closed 5 months ago
I'll rebase #97. Can you then rebase this on that PR instead?
if you add 97 that would screw up mine I guess? Would be unfair after a year letting that other thing linger
if you add 97 that would screw up mine I guess?
I thought I wrote in here that this duplicates some parts of #97, but I can't find that comment. Maybe I never submitted it...
Would be unfair after a year letting that other thing linger
IMO this PR is a reason to finish up #97, while previously it was just "nice to have".
well, you can rebase on this one if you have to rebase anyway :)
well, you can rebase on this one if you have to rebase anyway :)
"Fix calling without installation" is incomplete and I personally don't like type -P $0
or using the ${pfx%/*/*}
syntax. At that point it doesn't matter much whether #97 is changed to be more like the commit here or the other way around. I'll just merge them both together and add a Co-authored-by
tag. Does that sound good?
fine with me. calling dirname etc requires external programs for something bash can do by itself. bad style :)
rebased on yours
ok now?
updated
ping?