search

openSUSE / obs-build

OBS build script, can be used with OBS or stand alone
GNU General Public License v2.0
133 stars 188 forks source link

Failed to use --baselibs to build bi-arch package icecream-x86-arm #261

Closed CapOM closed 8 years ago

CapOM commented 8 years ago

Hi,

It is possible to use the same original spec file to build bi-arch packages ? (bi-arch: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_baselibs.conf)

I am trying to build the bi-arch package "icecream-x86-arm-0.9.7-1.armv7l.rpm" with the original spec file: https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=platform/upstream/icecream.git;a=blob;f=packaging/icecream.spec; and also just adding a baselibs.conf file which contains:

arch i686 targets armv7l:x86-arm i686:x86-arm aarch64:x86-arm arch x86_64 targets armv7l:x86-arm x86_64:x86-arm aarch64:x86-arm

targettype x86-arm package icecream targettype x86-arm autoreqprov off targettype x86-arm extension -arm targettype x86-arm requires "icecream" targettype x86-arm prefix /emul targettype x86-arm +/

It succeeds to generates icecream-x86-arm-0.9.7-1.i686.rpm but it is not installable withing the gbs chroot because it claims it is not for arm. I would expect to succeed since it is supposed to be a bi-arch package.

Any idea would be much appreciated. Thx Julien

CapOM commented 8 years ago

https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/67979/

hennevogel commented 8 years ago

I'm sorry that I have to close this, but we are tracking issues in the source code in here. Github issues are _not_ a way to request support from us.

However there is a vibrant community of developers, admins and users that support each other in their usage of the OBS. They meet online in a the OBS IRC chat (irc://irc.freenode.net/openSUSE-buildservice) or on the OBS mailing list (archive). Here you can ask questions if you have trouble understanding something, you can seek advice and mingle with other OBS community members.

Thank you for your consideration.

CapOM commented 8 years ago

Thx for pointing the mailing list and irc. (as for the patch I wrote a new one more appropriate https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/68353/ )