openSUSE / openSUSE-git

3 stars 5 forks source link

switch from gitea to forgejo #36

Open JanZerebecki opened 8 months ago

JanZerebecki commented 8 months ago

before it becomes incompatible https://forgejo.org/2024-02-forking-forward/

AdamMajer commented 8 months ago

:confused:

https://blog.gitea.com/a-message-from-lunny-on-gitea-ltd.-and-the-gitea-project/

It seems reasonable way forward for them to try something. To me it makes little sense to fork where the license remains free and they just want to try to make a business out of their work.

Storm in a teapot.

johanneskastl commented 8 months ago

I also had the impression that the Forgejo port was having more of the community on its side. Too me it seemed like the better option, and I never regretted switching.

mcepl commented 8 months ago

On Sun Feb 18, 2024 at 6:26 PM CET, Johannes Kastl wrote:

I also had the impression that the Forgejo port was having more of the community on its side. Too me it seemed like the better option, and I never regretted switching.

The question is whether with potentially so huge repository (including the internal one) we won’t be looking for the paid support eventually. Won’t we?

AdamMajer commented 8 months ago

Just about community size, for now the numbers are very much in favour of Gitea. Maybe that will change in the future. But for now, I think sticking with Gitea is the way to go.

image

image

JanZerebecki commented 8 months ago

There is paid support from multiple vendors available for Forgejo: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/professional-services/issues

https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/ looks to me in favor of Forgejo.

My understanding is that you can not see the community size that way as Forgejo tried to send every one of their changes to Gitea, until the announcement this month. I find it difficult to get better numbers. Maybe it will get more obvious in half a year or so, we can revisit then.

AdamMajer commented 8 months ago

I would vote to revisit this at a later point.