Closed averyfreeman closed 1 month ago
AFAIK cp --reflink is not supported by all file systems and cp --reflink still needs a complete run through the file system / directory. This is slow compared to snapshots using btrfs, bcachefs or lvm. A minor problem could also be that since the snapshot is not atomic the snapshot can also have inconsistent content.
What are the use-cases you have in mind? E.g. what file systems.
I was thinking only XFS, because I thought it's the only journaling FS that supports cp --reflink
(so far), as perhaps an alternative to thin provisioning.
There is scant resources for snapper + thin-lvm on the web, but I did just set up my first two machines and seem to have good results so far.
Thanks for the background, I wasn't aware there were so many potential stumbling blocks. If the ability to use cp --reflink
for snapshots were limited only to XFS, would that change things in your mind?
Edit: Maybe it would make more sense to create a stripped-down fork, e.g. file-snapper
, limited only to XFS reflinks and meant only for file recovery (as opposed to system/volume recovery)
Hi, really appreciate you guys maintaining this outstanding software
Curious if snapper is currently capable of creating snapshots via cp --reflink command, and if not, how technically feasible it could be, and if you're open to a PR
Thanks