Closed kazkojima closed 1 year ago
BTW, with removing suspicious bits !28_02 !28_04 !29_01 from RIOI.ILOGIC_Y1.ISERDES.NETWORKING.DDR.W8 and !25_85 from RIOB18.IOB_Y0.SSTL135.DRIVE.I_FIXED, there is no more conflict during building litedram. Now there are many "Segment DB XXX, key YYY not found from line ZZZ" failures. Here is a list of missing keys, though they could be artifacts by my incomplete nextpnr-xilinx iob18 support.
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK0.HCLK_IOI_CK_BUFHCLK0
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK10.HCLK_IOI_CK_BUFHCLK10
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK4.HCLK_IOI_CK_BUFHCLK4
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_LEAF_GCLK_BOT0.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK0
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_LEAF_GCLK_BOT1.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK4
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_LEAF_GCLK_TOP0.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK0
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_LEAF_GCLK_TOP1.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK4
HCLK_IOI.HCLK_IOI_LEAF_GCLK_TOP2.HCLK_IOI_CK_IGCLK10
HCLK_IOI.STEPDOWN
RIOB18.IOB_Y0.IN_TERM.UNTUNED_SPLIT_40
RIOB18.IOB_Y0.LVCMOS12_LVCMOS15_LVCMOS18_SSTL135_SSTL15.STEPDOWN
RIOB18.IOB_Y0.LVCMOS12_LVCMOS15_SSTL135_SSTL15.STEPDOWN
RIOB18.IOB_Y0.SSTL135_SSTL15.IN
RIOB18.IOB_Y1.IN_TERM.UNTUNED_SPLIT_40
RIOB18.IOB_Y1.LVCMOS12_LVCMOS15_LVCMOS18_SSTL135_SSTL15.STEPDOWN
RIOB18.IOB_Y1.LVCMOS12_LVCMOS15_SSTL135_SSTL15.STEPDOWN
RIOB18.IOB_Y1.LVDS_SSTL135_SSTL15.IN_DIFF
RIOI.ILOGIC_Y0.ISERDES.MODE.MASTER
RIOI.ILOGIC_Y0.ISERDES.NUM_CE.N1
RIOI.IOI_ILOGIC0_CLK.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_ILOGIC0_CLKB.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_ILOGIC1_CLK.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_ILOGIC1_CLKB.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_OCLKM_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_OCLKM_1.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_OCLK_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_OCLK_1.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC0_CLKDIV.IOI_LEAF_GCLK1
RIOI.IOI_OLOGIC1_CLKDIV.IOI_LEAF_GCLK1
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OCLKM_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OCLKM_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK2
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OCLKM_1.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OCLK_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OCLK_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK2
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OCLK_1.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OLOGIC0_CLKDIV.IOI_LEAF_GCLK1
RIOI_TBYTESRC.IOI_OLOGIC1_CLKDIV.IOI_LEAF_GCLK1
RIOI_TBYTETERM.ILOGIC_Y0.ISERDES.MODE.MASTER
RIOI_TBYTETERM.ILOGIC_Y0.ISERDES.NUM_CE.N1
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_ILOGIC0_CLK.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_ILOGIC0_CLKB.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_OCLKM_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_OCLKM_1.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_OCLK_0.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_OCLK_1.IOI_LEAF_GCLK0
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_OLOGIC0_CLKDIV.IOI_LEAF_GCLK1
RIOI_TBYTETERM.IOI_OLOGIC1_CLKDIV.IOI_LEAF_GCLK1
IOB18 support is working. This ticket is obsolete.
Hi,
I'm trying to add a limited IOB18 support to nextpnr-xilinx based on @hansfbaier's new database.
Now I'm testing IOBUF, IDELAYE2, and {I,O}SERDESE2 with minimal test cases. This is because these components and SSTL135 iostandard would be needed for litedram DDR3 on xc7k325t. It seems missing database stuff may be as follows.
I saw a conflict on segbis_rioi.db with the litedram build.
Another conflict happens on segbits_int_r.db and segbits_riob18.db, though this could be a flaws in my xc7k325t/tilegrid.json which is crafted manually ATM.